QwQ 32B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot offers a larger context window. Choose QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | QwQ 32B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Fireworks AI |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.21 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.84 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Parameters | 33B | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Aider Polyglot score | 20.9 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | 1329 | — |
| GPQA Diamond score | 65.3 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 138 | — |
FAQ
Is QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot cheaper?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot is cheaper on output tokens ($0.84 vs $0.86 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, QwQ 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Spot has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.