DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro offers a larger context window. Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (China) | Xiaomi |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.29 | $0.44 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.86 | $0.87 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.1M |
| Parameters | — | 1T |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
| Released | Jan 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| GPQA Diamond score | 64.1 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 137 | — |
| LMArena (Chatbot Arena) Elo score | — | 1465 |
| LMArena WebDev Elo score | — | 1480 |
FAQ
Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro cheaper?
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.86 vs $0.87 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger context window (1.1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.