Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim)
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is cheaper on output tokens, while DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) offers a larger context window. Choose Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) based on the trade-off between cost, context, and the benchmarks that matter for your use case.
| Spec | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Abacus | LLM Gateway |
| Input / 1M tokens | $0.79 | $0.20 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $0.79 | $0.80 |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Parameters | — | — |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
| Released | Nov 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index score | 119 | — |
FAQ
Is Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) cheaper?
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B is cheaper on output tokens ($0.79 vs $0.80 per 1M).
Which has the larger context window, Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim)?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (entrim) has the larger context window (1M tokens).
Pricing is indicative — confirm with the provider before production use. Highlighted values indicate the better figure for that row.